- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Star Wars: Legacy: Fight Another Day
- Nominated by: Menkooroo (talk) 00:27, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Legacy at its best.
(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
- <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:36, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Excellent work. And I loved Francia's work on the series, so it's good to see that work chronicled on the Wook. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 01:59, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Protectorate (talk) 00:23, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
CC7567 (talk) 20:10, February 8, 2014 (UTC)- IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 21:46, February 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Cade
Calrayn 23:33, February 12, 2014 (UTC) - Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 01:40, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
Object
El Jefe
You're missing several character images in your bio section. I assume you did this purposefully, but why?IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:40, January 14, 2014 (UTC)- The character-image placement was a contentious issue throughout the entire OOU LG process, with images being placed on the right side emerging as the final compromise. Writing this article and fixing up my old OOU FAs back in October were my first forays into doing OOU articles under the new LG, and I found that only including images for selected characters looked a lot better than including images for everyone. It gives us images that are big enough to legibly display the characters' faces rather than really small and really squished pictures, and, IMO, it reinforces the idea that images support text much better than giving everyone an image would. I did the same thing while fixing up Agents of Chaos, Legacy 23, and Into the Great Unknown, and I think that they look a lot better too. If the character bios were longer, like in Tales of the Jedi or the KOTOR comics, there would certainly be room for good-sized images for everyone, but with short bios like these, I like this approach better. Lemme know what you think. If you want, I'm totally willing to start a CT to add something to the Layout Guide about this, but at the same time I like giving article writers the choice to do either way. Menkooroo (talk) 14:29, January 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Nah, makes sense enough. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:39, January 18, 2014 (UTC)
- The character-image placement was a contentious issue throughout the entire OOU LG process, with images being placed on the right side emerging as the final compromise. Writing this article and fixing up my old OOU FAs back in October were my first forays into doing OOU articles under the new LG, and I found that only including images for selected characters looked a lot better than including images for everyone. It gives us images that are big enough to legibly display the characters' faces rather than really small and really squished pictures, and, IMO, it reinforces the idea that images support text much better than giving everyone an image would. I did the same thing while fixing up Agents of Chaos, Legacy 23, and Into the Great Unknown, and I think that they look a lot better too. If the character bios were longer, like in Tales of the Jedi or the KOTOR comics, there would certainly be room for good-sized images for everyone, but with short bios like these, I like this approach better. Lemme know what you think. If you want, I'm totally willing to start a CT to add something to the Layout Guide about this, but at the same time I like giving article writers the choice to do either way. Menkooroo (talk) 14:29, January 14, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
I'm going to call for the succession box-ish thing in the Bibliography to be removed. I've only really seen it used on Legacy and Tales of the Jedi, and it's redundant to both the infobox (which has previous and next fields for this exact reason) and the navbox that is just a single section away. It's not like a title infobox, the contents of which aren't always available in the article. Cade Calrayn 19:02, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 03:02, February 13, 2014 (UTC)