Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Star Saber XC-01 starfighter

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Star Saber XC-01 starfighter

• Nominated by: Graestan^(Talk) 05:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Okay, that's all. I promise. Graestan^(Talk) 05:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. More TOTJ goodness.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 16:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
3. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 23:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
4. --Eyrezer 23:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
5. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 00:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Toprawa:
   • Can we link to a mission here? "From their initial combat mission against the Krath stronghold of Cinnagar"
   • The fourth paragraph of the History section contains too much peripheral detail that distracts from the subject of the Star Saber. Please trim the fat. See me if needed.
   • I've read this sentence at least three times now. Please do something to amend this. I might recommend removing one of the previous two: "In the war and the era that followed, the pilots who chose to fly the fighters included Jedi who could compensate for their shortcomings with the Force."
     • Nice work on the editorial decision-making concerning the spec discrepancies. :)
     • Not an objection, but I changed "laser cannons" to "blaster cannons" in both the intro and body per the infobox. Change back if that's incorrect at all. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
2. The description section and the infobox disagree on the class of hyperdrive. From the BTS stuff, I guess the infobox is correct. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 20:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
   • Fixed. Someone had a better version of my editorial decision, which I failed to fully implement. Graestan^(Talk) 23:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 00:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)