Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Selkath/Legends

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Selkath

Support

1. --Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
2. Darthchristian ^(Hey!) 23:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
3. Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
4. .... 21:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
5. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6. Jinko 21:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
7. Flipperheads! KEJ 11:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
8. --Eyrezer 06:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

• "History and culture" section is too generic. Split it up. .... 23:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Done. I know that it says an IP did it, but it was me, the Culture and History sections are seperate.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 13:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
• I think some more information on kolto needs to be integrated into the article. I don't know enough about it to do it myself. --Eyrezer 02:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Why? There is really no information about it at all. Besides, it really doesn't have a huge impact on the article.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 11:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Kolto is a central aspect of Selkath life and history. Yet the biggest explanation of it is currently in the intro. That is not enough to get my support. --Eyrezer 11:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• The "The Worlds of Knights of the Old Republic" link doesn't seem to work. --Eyrezer 06:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't know. I'm not that good with external links.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 13:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Fixed the link. --Eyrezer 01:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Quote under Selkath in the Galaxy is unsourced. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 09:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Done.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 15:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Too many images. -- 09:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Done.--Shaelas^{(Ahto High Court)} 20:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • No there's not. There's only ten. It doesn't make the text look choppy either. I am afraid that, while that is a legitamate objection, you are incorrect in saying so. Perhaps, after reconsideration, you will strike your objection voluntarily.--Shaelas^{(HoloConference)} 04:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Perhaps, after reconsideration, you'll remove some images. --Imp 23:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
      • The number of images is acceptable. I think that your personal opinion is not valid. Since it does not take away from the value of the article, such as making the text uneven, and the images are not cluttered, the number of images is not an issue.--Shaelas^{(Ahto High Court)} 23:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Mention of the Jedi Qual seems to be out of chronology - he should be mentioned before the KOTOR video game councillors, as he lived and died decades before hand. And yes, too many images. QuentinGeorge 07:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Approved by Inquisitorius - Wookieepedia:Inq/Selkath 23:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• I have done alot of work, let us hope that this goes well.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
• Eh! Good work.--Darthchristian ^(Hey!) 23:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
• Rather than simply a notable Selkath section, it's good to expand it out and give some detail on famous Selkath, see Drovian or Tunroth for examples. --Eyrezer 03:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Per Eyrezer. Let's expand the list some.Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 22:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• That's not a legitamate objection. Besides, there isn't really that much information on any of them to include that isn't already in the article.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 23:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Notice it's in the Comments section... Cull Tremayne 23:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Duh. But they shouldn't do things like this, and not support the article on a whim, just because something would look better a certain way. A lot of things would look better in a certain way, but there is so little information on individual Selkath, that what they ask is near to impossible.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 23:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
      • For one, you should notice I didn't actually oppose the article. I think you've done a good job with it, but I do think it could be improved in a couple of ways. Simply having a list of notable Selkath is pointless. Just put them in the infobox and be done with it. Alternatively, an article like Rakririan shows what can be done with little information. --Eyrezer 06:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
        • There, I added and sourced a new section as specified by you.--Doquis^{(HoloConference)} 14:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Did a little cleanup - Jinko 21:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Thanks.--Shaelas^{(HoloConference)} 11:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)