- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Scimitar assault wing
- Nominated by: Sir Cavalier of One
(Squadron channel) 11:02, March 7, 2013 (UTC) - Nomination comments: You try thinking of something funny involving scimitars.
(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
- --Eyrezer (talk) 12:41, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
I'm Tomax and this is Xamot. We're twins who can feel each other's pain! IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 04:10, March 9, 2013 (UTC)- Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:19, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
- 501st dogma(talk) 23:07, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Cade
Calrayn 23:42, May 1, 2013 (UTC) - CC7567 (talk) 21:34, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:08, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
Object
501st
One thing: In the Squadrons section, you say that the reconnaissance fighters were slower than the TIEs. However, later you contradict this in the reconnaissance fighter's section by saying they could go fast enough to avoid combat.501st dogma(talk) 23:35, April 16, 2013 (UTC)- Alas, the contradiction is not mine, but with the source. I tried to word it vaguely enough that the references to the specific TIE/rcs used by the Scimitars were separate enough from the standard issue TIE/rc, and that the TIE/rcs were only slower in relation to the TIE fighters used by the Scimitar assault wing. Note that the info in the starfighter section does not state that they were comparable at all to the TIE/LN. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 22:06, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Alas, the contradiction is not mine, but with the source. I tried to word it vaguely enough that the references to the specific TIE/rcs used by the Scimitars were separate enough from the standard issue TIE/rc, and that the TIE/rcs were only slower in relation to the TIE fighters used by the Scimitar assault wing. Note that the info in the starfighter section does not state that they were comparable at all to the TIE/LN. - Sir Cavalier of One
Cadeth
I think that the Special Unit squadron can probably go in the Members field on the infobox.- My understanding is that this field is generally reserved for specific individuals, not sub-units.
Also, would it be wrong or unnecessary to make articles for the five other squadrons? It seems like you've got enough info on them...- I would say no. Special Unit squadron is the only squadron explicitly named, which is why I redlinked it but not created since I'm in two minds about creating the article itself. Since they're not named, and really only described in the vaguest terms, I would say its unnecessary.
Should the Hook Nebula section not have a {{Main}} template?- Added.
Article for the capital of Nulan VI.Cade Calrayn 19:47, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Linked and created. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 22:14, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Linked and created. - Sir Cavalier of One
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 03:10, June 5, 2013 (UTC)