Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Sate Pestage/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Sate Pestage

(5 Inq/5 Users/10 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote Victorious on all fronts. - Lord Hydronium 21:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Thefourdotelipsis 01:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote StarNeptuneTalk to me! 02:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  4. QuentinGeorge 03:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  5. Let's not wait to FA Sate! Ozzel 02:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  6. That was two-thirds of a pun, Ozzel - PU!--Goodwood 23:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
  8. Inqvote Greyman(Paratus) 02:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  9. Chack Jadson Talk 18:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  10. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 21:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Not much to complain about. Could use a bit of explanation as to what the heck the Imperial Tribunal was, as it just appears from nowhere. Also, I had to read the last paragraph of Flight to Ciutric a couple of times and I'm still not sure I understand it. Who's the tribune, Isard? Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
    • "Tribune" is a typo; I've fixed it to "Tribunal". I don't know if there was anything else that was confusing about that paragraph, but see if it makes more sense now. The comic doesn't really explain where the Tribunal came from (it just appears in Mandatory Retirement), but I tried to clear it up a little. - Lord Hydronium 01:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Rephrase the second paragraph of P&T, as it's too similar to some things stated earlier in the article (such as the part about the Quarren who Pestage dismissed as an animal seems to be repeated there). Chack Jadson Talk 20:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
    • It's mentioned once in the context of the plot, and once to describe his personality. I don't see that as much of a problem, though perhaps you'd be fine if the wording were simply changed to be less similar? Don't know how to get around the "animal" thing, though, since that kind of sums up his views nicely. - Lord Hydronium 03:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I like this nom, but my one problem is the lack of info on the final fate of Vocis Kenit. Once that gets a little mention, I'm happy to vote for it. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 21:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Approved by Inquisitorius 23:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)