Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Reginald Barkbone

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Reginald Barkbone
    • 1.1 (5 Inqs/2 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Green Tentacle
        • 1.1.2.2 Jujiggum
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Reginald Barkbone

  • Nominated by: -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:03, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(5 Inqs/2 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. This guy's weird.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 04:57, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Excellent; Ackbar's back and there's gonna be trouble...—Tommy 9281 21:08, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
  3. YARRR! QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 19:45, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:40, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Nice to see another quality Ackbar nom --Eyrezer 12:12, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:37, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 17:46, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Green Tentacle
  • Context for Seven Sectors. From clicking the link, I guess this isn't entirely possible but you can probably mention that the sectors are unknown, either to Tigellinus or in the BTS.
    • Added that Tigellinus didn't know them in the bio.
  • Could also use some brief context for Lok Pirate's Cant. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:20, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
    • Done that too for the bio. Thanks for the review! -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:24, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Jujiggum
  • Does the source actually use the elipses in the opening quote? If so, then it's fine, but if not, then the elipses should be enclosed like so: […]
    • Added square brackets.
  • Do we know for sure whether Barkbone went insane, or is this just Tigellinus' speculation? The bio and intro make it sound for sure like Barkbone lost his sanity, but in the P&T you say only that Tigellinus questioned his sanity.
    • Clarified.
  • I'd also suggest that you go through the article once and make sure that none of the links are redirects—I caught a few in my copyedit, but it might be a good idea to double-check for good measure.
    • I cleaned up all the other redirects. --Eyrezer 12:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • That's all I've got. Fine work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:02, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much, and thanks for the review. Sorry about the delay in getting to these. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 10:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
      • No problem. :) Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 17:46, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 17:46, August 18, 2010 (UTC)