Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Peragus II

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Peragus II

  • Nominated by: --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 20:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: When I first started editing again, I wouldn't have GANed it and would have merely FANed it, had I better known the Wook. Either way, many objections will have been fixed by the GAN process. --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 20:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total/INQCON 1)

Support

Object

  1. Jinzler
    • According to The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, the original mining colony was destroyed millenia before the Jedi Civil War. Also, it says that the Peragus Mining Facility was established by a group of mercenaries and tradesmen, who supplied Republic forces during the Great Sith War. You should mention these things in the article --Jinzler 10:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
  2. Pasta!
    • First, some preliminaries before I go in-depth:
    • Information from the Atlas is missing.
    • TSL is used as a citation for information that does not come from the game. For example, 3,951 BBY does not come from the game itself; I'm also pretty certain that "Peragus system" does not come from the game as well. Please fix these. Other sources are plentiful to cite for these things.
    • The infobox states that the population was "none" but there is an inhabitants section. Please reconcile this.
    • Nothing from the Prima Guide? Not even a mention?
    • — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:04, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (Inquisitorius only)

  1. Inqvote I hate to do this, but these objections have been sitting here for nineteen days; and, the user seems to have a propensity to allowing these things to slip. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 20:19, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote—Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG (No truth in me) 20:29, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Ridiculous. There are way too many noms for this kind of thing. If you can't afford enough dedication to maintain a nomination, then don't nominate it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:33, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 23:29, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote CC7567 (talk) 23:42, September 23, 2009 (UTC)