- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Mission to Prakith
- Nomination by: —Tommy9281
(Peace is a lie) 04:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC) - Nomination comments: And so it is with this one as it has been with those that came before…minus the flowers ;)
(5 Inqs/2 Users/7 Total)
Support
- Darth Acheron123
- SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 06:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
—Xwing328(Talk) 03:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Good work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
- Toprawa:
This introduction needs more concrete context. "Decades before" what? "Decades before, A'Sharad Hett, who would become Darth Krayt, Dark Lord of the Sith, had been captured by the extra-galactic Yuuzhan Vong species, and implanted with their Yorik-Kul slave seeds."- Addressed.
The article never really establishes clearly before this reference that Wyyrlok took the holocron. Please clarify explicitly in the previous section: "With Andeddu's holocron in hand"- Addressed.
I don't really know what this means. Can we say this in English? "duel on the battlefield of the mind"Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)- Yeah, I think that phrase works. It's nice imagery, if anything. —Xwing328(Talk) 03:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, what should I do here? One Inq says change it, another says it's good. Please advise on a proper course of action, thanks.—Tommy
(Nine two eight one) 01:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- If it's unclear what it means, especially to an Inq who's read a lot of these, it should definitely be changed. It might be a nice phrase, but clarity should be the most important thing. - Lord Hydronium 02:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. I don't think asking for a little tweaking for clarity is too much here, and for all the Inqing you don't do, Xwing, I think we can find more productive things to do with our time than ragging on other's objections. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- If it's unclear what it means, especially to an Inq who's read a lot of these, it should definitely be changed. It might be a nice phrase, but clarity should be the most important thing. - Lord Hydronium 02:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, what should I do here? One Inq says change it, another says it's good. Please advise on a proper course of action, thanks.—Tommy
- Yeah, I think that phrase works. It's nice imagery, if anything. —Xwing328(Talk) 03:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 05:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)