Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Massacre on Lenico IV

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Massacre on Lenico IV

  • Nominated by: Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 04:42, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A seemingly simple event with a big context requirement.

(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Plagueis327 (talk) 05:43, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:52, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 18:11, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Coruscantfan (Talk) 01:55, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 10:58, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  6. 501st dogma(talk) 13:00, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote Menkooroo (talk) 06:32, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • Intro": "The slaughter was just one of many committed by Kressh in her role as the apprentice of the Sith Emperor, but also proved to be her last." This sentence just seems out of place within the intro. I think her service under the Sith Emperor (her being the Emperor's loyal servant, sent on missions) should be contextified first.
  • "That changed on the dead Outer Rim world of Lenico IV," What do you mean by "dead"? Unable to support life? That seems false since the Ortolans are able to live there.
  • Prelude: "Although he had already artificially extended his lifespan by sterilizing the planet Nathema with the Force," IIRC, he absorbed the Force energy Nihilus-style. I may be wrong, but if this is the case it should be mentioned, since "sterilizing" leaves what happened somewhat vague.
  • Nice work. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 04:58, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  1. Is it true or not that all events in the infobox must be mentioned in body? Here you don't have them all in the body, so add them if I'm right. 501st dogma(talk) 01:08, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • What's currently missing? If it's something from the prev, conc, or next fields, those are excepted from the rule, per the layout guide. Everything else should be included; if it's something else, feel free to add an objection about it. Menkooroo (talk) 05:12, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
      • The next, conc and prev fields had some unique info in them. I'll support then. 13:00, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Be careful of double-linking. Menkooroo (talk) 06:32, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 06:32, February 18, 2013 (UTC)