Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Marka Ragnos

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Marka Ragnos

  • Nominated by: EdisKrad327
  • Nomination comments: Now it looks better!

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Good work! Mr. Frank 00:52, April 4, 2011 (UTC) (Vote stricken per Wookieepedia:Single-issue voters)

Object

GTQ
  • A few grammar problem for example you need an apostrophe in the resurrection instead of jedis, Jedi's. Jedi and Sith must be capitalized also no links in quotes GTQ 23:35, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • I have repaired the ones I saw. Ediskrad327 23:51, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
      • Still need to add the apostrophe in the resurrection attempt section. Also one last thing how is that quote relevant to the behind the scenes section.GTQ 00:21, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
The clone
  • This article does not adhere to a number of the FAN requirements, most notably Rules 1, 3, and 4, but others as well. It requires a lot of work, and I doubt that it is ready to be judged as part of the FAN process. I would sincerely recommend that you become more familiar with the requirements of a Featured Article before nominating something to be one—the level of detail in particular is severely lacking, and although I'm no expert in this area of canon, I would also say that the Sources and Appearances lists are incomplete. My recommendation to you would be to remove this as a FAN and work on it separately outside of the FAN process, because it simply needs an extensive overhaul. CC7567 (talk) 02:34, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • The reason of why this articles is "severely lacking" is due to the reason that there's virtually very few details regarding with Marka Ragnos, because all his 4 appearances are as a spirit, and his most notable appearance within the star wars canon is star wars Jedi Academy.

189.192.146.138 16:45, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Holocron

I'm not going to write a full review for the reasons CC7567 stated, but I noticed that the article hasn't been sourced correctly. Regardless of the outcome of this nomination, the sourcing guide needs to be followed. Specifically, the full version of the reference has been used throughout the entire article when it should only appear once.

Furthermore, any reference in the infobox needs to have the {{Ref}} tag added. The sourcing guide explains this better than I do, so read through it carefully and then update accordingly. Holocron Greatholocron (Complain) 12:00, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

You need to put it at the bottom of the Featured Article Nominations page GTQ 23:40, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (Inq only)

  1. Inqvote Idle for three weeks. 1358 (Talk) 09:36, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:38, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote --Eyrezer 09:43, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Grunny (talk) 10:00, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Let's cut the crap.—Tommy 9281 Thursday, April 28, 2011, 22:24 UTC