Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Lost Temple

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Lost Temple

  • Nominated by: -- Cull Tremayne 02:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 1477 words.

(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote There are a lot of "uncertain fate"-type sentences, and technically, you don't need to ref IU articles that only have one appearance/source. How many Ewoks FAs would this make now? —Xwing328(Talk) 22:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Coming in 2009: Han Solo and the Lost Temple! Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 03:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote -- Darth Culator (Talk) 04:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Object

  1. Few small things:
    • No need to have all your references so tiny.
      • Could you elaborate a little? I'm not sure what you mean.
        • Sorry. Compare the actual size of the references in this article to the ones in another article. You used the same format used for infobox refs for the whole article. Normally, the refs should be a little bigger (removed the {{ref|}} bit). Does that help? Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
          • Ah, I get it. Fixed. Cull Tremayne 22:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
    • "However, for some unknown reason, this exit had a horizontally closing gateway, which could prevent any intruders from escaping." This seems to contradict itself. Isn't the gate there to prevent them from escaping? So the reasons are known, right?
      • Good catch. I was trying to say that the mechanism that triggered its closing was unknown, but then I obviously confused myself. :S
    • A bit of context on Terpas, please.
      • Gave a minor explanation after the initial mention. Did there need to be further context given later in the article?
    • I like it. Crazy Ewoks. Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
      • They love their kooky adventures alright. :D Thanks for the review. Cull Tremayne 04:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. "What triggered the closure of this exit was not entirely certain." It presumably was to the people who built it. I know people object to "is not entirely certain" so can you rephrase it to say it was uncertain to the Ewoks or something? Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Good point. I reworded it. Cull Tremayne 07:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. From the desk of Atarumaster88
    • "Due to the design of the temple, the builders may have belonged to a race of upright walking avians, as the temple was adorned with several full size statues of bird-like creatures, including a large head that hung over the main entrance." Speculation must die.
      • Gone now.
    • That's all. Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 03:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the review. Cull Tremayne 03:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 11:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)