Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Kon'me

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Kon'me
    • 1.1 (4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Xicer
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Kon'me

  • Nominated by: Eyrezer 09:10, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: None.

(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Good work. --Imperialles 15:31, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Looks good to me.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 17:17, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Yay, WTS! Thefourdotelipsis 08:22, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 06:13, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:02, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote CC7567 (talk) 04:57, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote—Tommy 9281 20:56, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Xicer
  • S&C: "The richer upper-class generally made the majority of Bal'demnic's decisions, while the lower-class usually followed the higher-class' orders and would pay for any resulting repercussions" Where is this last part from? I can't find anything in the DB entry that says the lower-class obeyed the upper-class and had to pay for repercussions. I also can't find anything that says the upper-class was actually richer than the lower-class, as obvious as it may seem.
    • Removed. --Eyrezer 06:06, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Bts: "On the basis of a perceived physical resemblance, Arthur Papadam named the Kon'me species after "The Mekon," the main villain in the British Dan Dare comic strip that began in the 1950s." He actually says he named them based on their resemblance to the villain from the game, not the comic strip. As he notes, the game was based off of the strip, but apparently the game villain looked different from the strip version.
    • I've reworked the Bts. I'll try and find a pic of Mekon from the game later, and add it to the Bts if I have any success. --Eyrezer 22:36, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Bts: "…although no reference to this made it into the final version of Bal'demnic's Databank entry." This statement should probably be sourced to the DB entry, not the blog.
    • Made a change. Is this what you were after? --Eyrezer 21:37, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
      • Yes, it was. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 22:01, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Cool read otherwise. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 20:07, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 20:56, July 12, 2010 (UTC)