Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Knol Ven'nari (second nomination)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Knol Ven'nari

• Nominated by: ToRsO bOy (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Addressed the objections here
• Date Archived: 15:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• Final word count: 1057 words (301 introduction, 693 body, 63 behind the scenes)
• Word count at nomination time: 1025 words (298 introduction, 676 body, 51 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. —spookywilloww^talk 18:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
2. Nice work on restoring Lewisr (talk) 03:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 12:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
4. CometSmudge (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
5. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 05:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
6. Bonzane10 05:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

spookly

• I don't think the comic alone can source the exact BBY placement of Knol's death—the comic's opening page only notes how many months after Geonosis it was. I'd recommend working back in the previously-present sourcing for that dating in a manually written note, as it'll need the chronology book's support (which is what had been meant by the combine fields objection, for a manual note).
  • Just to clarify, when you say "working back in the previously-present sourcing for that dating in a manually written note", you mean something like adding a 2nd source with an explanation? Similar to this as an example Jez Planchet?
    • In this edit, you removed the NEC cite used to tie the Queyta mission to 21.7. That has to be added back in, but in a manual note 'X must have died in X year, because NEC places the mission in which it occurred in [whatever BBY]."; not quite as complex as Jez's though.—spookywilloww^talk 18:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
      • Appreciate you explaining that in detail. Added back in. ToRsO bOy (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
        • Looks good; did a slight tweak to abide by the one-reference for death field precedent.—spookywilloww^talk 18:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
• Tied to above, but "21.7" needs to also be tucked somewhere into the body of the article, and ideally the intro as well, as it's infobox exclusive at the moment at that level of specific-ness. I do see that the overall year is pipelinked, but the number itself should be present as well.—spookywilloww^talk 04:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Added "21.7" into the intro and body. ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
• Also just noticed, but the sentence "After this, the Separatists planned on using it against the clone troopers who served the Grand Army of the Republic." from the biography isn't referenced at the end.—spookywilloww^talk 22:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Updated the sentence so I can use the same sourcing. Thanks. ToRsO bOy (talk) 16:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Dani

• Hair and eye color are infobox exclusive. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 03:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Sorry, what does this mean? I should add a mention of her hair and eye color somewhere in the article? ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Yes, anything in the infobox linked/mentioned, should also be linked/mentioned in the body of the article. Make sure to use the same reference for both mentions. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 21:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
      • Gotcha. Added! ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
        • Not great to have a single sentence paragraph, go ahead and just combine it with the rest of the section. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 18:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
          • Combined. ToRsO bOy (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 15:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)