- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Harkas
(6 Inqs/2 Users/8 Total)
Support
Greyman(Paratus) 23:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)- Good work, even if it is Legacy. Thefourdotelipsis 08:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- -- Darth Culator (Talk) 21:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Greyman+trooper=FA. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)- —Graestan(This party's over) 23:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Harkas herald angels sing! -- Ozzel 22:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Imperialles 22:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Object
Images should be re-uploaded with unblanked speech bubbles. Stuff like "Harkas expressing his anger at Maleval." where he's not saying a word looks terrible.- Lord Hydronium 09:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)- That's not a rule base objection, and more of a personal opinion ;) Per this CT archive it was decided by the community, "Comic speech bubbles may be blanked or completely removed. This remains optional." As such, I chose the option of blanking the speech bubbles, just as I do in all articles I write :) Greyman(Paratus) 13:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rule 16. The blanking detracts from the quality of the images here. - Lord Hydronium 21:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said in IRC, not in my opinion it doesn't. And that's really stretching rule 16 to suit your side of the argument, especially since Imp's objection below is what rule 16 is really all about. If you need to reupload those images with the speech just so the "quality" of the image is better, in your opinion, then go for it. I don't want to see this nomination die over something as petty as this, especially since the whiting out of the speech bubbles doesn't break policy. Anyways, like I said in IRC, do what you gotta do. Greyman(Paratus) 21:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Per IRC agreement, I'll upload rescanned versions soon, fixing Imp's objection too. - Lord Hydronium 21:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said in IRC, not in my opinion it doesn't. And that's really stretching rule 16 to suit your side of the argument, especially since Imp's objection below is what rule 16 is really all about. If you need to reupload those images with the speech just so the "quality" of the image is better, in your opinion, then go for it. I don't want to see this nomination die over something as petty as this, especially since the whiting out of the speech bubbles doesn't break policy. Anyways, like I said in IRC, do what you gotta do. Greyman(Paratus) 21:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rule 16. The blanking detracts from the quality of the images here. - Lord Hydronium 21:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Now I don't feel so bad about my previous FA stunts. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 22:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's not a rule base objection, and more of a personal opinion ;) Per this CT archive it was decided by the community, "Comic speech bubbles may be blanked or completely removed. This remains optional." As such, I chose the option of blanking the speech bubbles, just as I do in all articles I write :) Greyman(Paratus) 13:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[[:File:Harkas.jpg]] and [[:File:Harkas3.jpg]] need to be rescanned (they're awfully distorted). I can forgive [[:File:Harkas2.jpg]] and [[:File:Harkas and Trask on Ossus.jpg]], but these too should ideally be rescanned.--Imperialles 16:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Approved by Inquisitorius 19:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)