Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/HK-47

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

HK-47

Support

1. Darth Ceratis 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
2. --IG-Prime^(IG-2000) 21:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
3. RC 2413 15:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?Grand Moff Rhell 17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
5. .... 23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
6. SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
7. --CommanderGree117 17:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
8. Starwarsrulez 18:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
9. Statement: I support this. KEJ 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
10. Jedi master Rimsek ^{My rantings} 19:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
11. DAWUSS 18:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
12. Nejee16 23:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
13. Tyg13 00:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
14. Nice Stake black ^msg 00:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

• It has two red links. Fix those and I'll vote.--IG-Prime^(IG-2000) 12:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• Main image is unsourced. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 18:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I got rid of the red links. I am currently working on finding the main image's source info.Darth Ceratis 20:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I'd really like that image sourced and all of the images to use the {{Information}} template. Besides that, this seems pretty good. —Xwing328^(Talk) 05:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
      • All images are sourced now, according to the {{Information}} template.Darth Ceratis 21:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Intro seems a little short. Jorrel Fraajic 14:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Intro made longer. Jorrel Fraajic 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The new rules don't apply here, per Ataru's comments at the bottom section.--IG-Prime^(IG-2000) 12:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Uhhh, well QuentinGeorge disagrees, and it is his right to object to it. You could perhaps ask the Inquisitorius to strike it. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Too long of an intro (Rule 7) Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Fixed (sort of). The intro's still long, but I tinkered with the opening paragraph, and it should be concise, yet informative enough to get the necessary points across. Or maybe I'm so totally wrong that there isn't even a word for it. Jwebb13^HoloNet 03:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • It's still too long. Condense it to about half of that size! Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
      • The opening paragraph or the entire opening section? Jwebb13^HoloNet 06:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
      • This is a little strange: It was too short, so we lengthen it, then new rules come in and it's too long...can we just use the intro as it was originally?Darth Ceratis 02:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
        • The intro is the first section of prose immediately before the main body, and it should be about 6-9 decent sized sentences, IMO. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
          • Hmm. never mind what I said earlier, the original intro has nothing with Trials of Obi Wan.Darth Ceratis 23:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
• Bad introduction (rule 7). --Imp 20:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I've tried to cut back on the information, but it is extremely hard. Anyone have any suggestions? ^Jorrel_Fraajic 02:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Don't cut back just organize it so it is more coherent.--Dooku^{(Solar Sailer)} 05:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
      • I trimmed it a bit more; see if it's acceptable now. jSarek 05:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Could use both image and prose cleanup (Rule 1), particularly in the "From Master to Master" section. - breathesgelatin^Talk 20:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm not really sure what's wrong with any of it at this point. It looks fine to me, I can't see any way to improve it more.Darth Ceratis 18:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR I and II. — 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?
  • Yes. It's italicized in the subtitles when he says it in the game.Darth Ceratis 21:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Hmm. There's three new redlinks concerning bits associated with Trials of Obi Wan. I'm really not too knowlegable about that part of this, so I'm not sure if there even need to be links there or if articles should be created. If someone could take a look at them and fix them, I'd be grateful.Darth Ceratis 01:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Never mind, I removed the links. I see no standing objections, can this go on the queue?Darth Ceratis 02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • There are some new rules which are in place, one of which is approval by the Inquisitorius. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)