Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Guardian of Forever

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Guardian of Forever

Support

  1. Cull Tremayne 04:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. A well-written article on something I knew nothing about; I'm oddly impressed to find something like this. Jwebb13HoloNetSith Emblem 08:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. This is the kind of FA I like to see! .... 09:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 02:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  6. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  7. --Eyrezer 03:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Not all paragraphs have citations. Fix that, and I'll be happy to support. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 15:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I sourced the end of the first paragraph. If you're referring to the second and last paragraphs in the Bio, the entire text is cited at the end of the paragraph, since it all comes from one source in both cases. Or do you want redundant sourcing throughout both those paragraphs? Cull Tremayne 17:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Never mind, just did it anyway. Cull Tremayne 17:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • There's too many images, making the article look cluttered, especially towards the end. --ATATatarismall.png 14:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Approved by Inquisitorius - Wookieepedia:Inq/Guardian of Forever 20:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

  • A big old beast on the front page...yeah, that's what we need. :-P Cull Tremayne 04:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Yeah, but you know every pathetic little Trekkie who comes here to check up on their betters is going to think someone ripped off the name from that big hunk of rock they used for a time machine in the original series. We'll never hear the end of it. On the other hand, I don't suppose the opinions of people who believe that a right turn qualifies as "evasive maneuvers" mean very much. ;) Jwebb13HoloNetSith Emblem 08:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • On a more serious note, I have noticed a few things which could stand a second look (the occasional missed comma, and it would scan better if a synonym or two for "city" were introduced), but nothing a quick once-over wouldn't catch. By the time the vote's over, I can see this one measuring up. Jwebb13HoloNetSith Emblem 08:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
    • I see what you mean about the word "city", I tried to replace several instances of it. Commas are a little harder to spot. Cull Tremayne 17:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Was this printed in color at all? --Eyrezer 01:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
    • I don't think so. There was an article about it (the comic is apparently rare) on TFN awhile back, which seemed to imply that World of Fire wasn't a reprint, meaning that it only came in black and white. However, I might be wrong. I'll go a-hunting. Cull Tremayne 22:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
      • And of course I'm wrong. :-P This is apparently a reprint of Marvel Star Wars UK 107-115. Did those come in color? From the covers of the comics, it seems that the Guardian was purple. Cull Tremayne 22:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
        • I asked because I have a "feeling" I have seen those pics in colour, but I'm not entirely sure. --Eyrezer 00:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • First encounter overuses the word "dismantled" a bit, but other than that it's fine. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Replaced with a few similes. Cull Tremayne 19:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)