- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Gaeriel Captison
Support
- Atarumaster88
(Audience Chamber) 15:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC) - --Shaelas(Ahto City)
16:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC) - .... 22:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
22:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)- Cull Tremayne 02:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- --Eyrezer 03:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Lord Hydronium 05:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support with the current infobox image. Jorrel
Fraajic 14:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
- I don't think the butchered infobox image is of good quality when it's not the full image. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- "Must include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available." It has two other images that are as good as they're getting. That's a reasonable number. Plus the infobox image quality is highly subjective and your impartiality in this matter is suspect. Therefore even if anyone takes this objection seriously, which we don't, it's still irrelevant. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 00:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I actually agree with Jaymach on this. For precedent on keeping the full image, see Isolder. --Eyrezer 12:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Err, what? So because Isolder has a freakishly proportioned infobox image, Gaeriel Captison should too? -- 15:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see the point in sacrificing a perfectly good image for the sake of a week it will appear on the front page of the site. The full image looks much better than the cut up one, and if the only reason is so that it appears "good" on the Main Page...well...that's not an improvement to the article. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not all infoboxes are the same length. Look at Millennium Falcon. for instance. The short pic there looks "freakishly" short compared with the infobox. --Eyrezer 01:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see the point in sacrificing a perfectly good image for the sake of a week it will appear on the front page of the site. The full image looks much better than the cut up one, and if the only reason is so that it appears "good" on the Main Page...well...that's not an improvement to the article. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Err, what? So because Isolder has a freakishly proportioned infobox image, Gaeriel Captison should too? --
- I actually agree with Jaymach on this. For precedent on keeping the full image, see Isolder. --Eyrezer 12:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- "Must include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available." It has two other images that are as good as they're getting. That's a reasonable number. Plus the infobox image quality is highly subjective and your impartiality in this matter is suspect. Therefore even if anyone takes this objection seriously, which we don't, it's still irrelevant. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 00:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- Approved by Inquisitorius - Wookieepedia:Inq/Gaeriel Captison 04:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fully sourced! There simply aren't many pictures of this lady though, but I did what I could. Beg, borrow, but not steal! Atarumaster88
(Audience Chamber) 15:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC) - Very nice. Cull Tremayne 02:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)