Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Economist/Legends

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Economist/Legends

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 20:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• Date Archived: 00:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
• Final word count: 1351 words (249 introduction, 821 body, 281 behind the scenes)
• Word count at nomination time: 1302 words (249 introduction, 777 body, 276 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional):

(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. —spookywilloww^talk 02:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
2. A FAN without an infobox? How common is that Lewisr (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
3. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 21:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:45, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
5. Skifffy (talk) 05:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
6. Booply (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss

• In the intro, you start with in 10 ABY, then jump back to 3996 BBY, and go chronologically. I think it would flow better if you moved the sentance "After warfare in 10 ABY caused incalculable damage and population casualties on the New Republic capital planet Coruscant, economists made dire predictions about how much time the city-world would need to recover—prognoses that were revealed to have been too pessimistic a year later." to near the end of the intro. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 19:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Sure, I could rearrange it to be strictly chronological (something that the article's body proper already is) but the reason why I prefer the current layout is it makes more sense content-wise - the first paragraph is about economists in general whereas the second paragraph focus on individual economists only. Imperators II^(Talk) 19:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Additional sources: —DKS MaXoO (talk) 03:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
  • "Galaxywide NewsNets" — Star Wars Adventure Journal 14 (Mentioned only) (as economic analyst) — p. 283
  • Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition — p. 199
    • Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded — p. 199
  • Star Wars Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook — p. 247
  • Star Wars Roleplaying Game Revised Core Rulebook — p. 320
  • The Official Star Wars Fact File 138 WAS 1-4: Waste Disposal
  • Star Wars Roleplaying Game Saga Edition Core Rulebook — p. 24
    • Thank you! Info from all but the first one added (though the second item was obviously meant to be the 1996 Revised Edition, right? :P) As for the first one, I'm sticking to explicit mentions of economists. The information out there is already messy enough as it is without any further assumptions being made. :) Imperators II^(Talk) 07:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
      • Exactly. Good catch! —DKS MaXoO (talk) 14:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 00:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)