- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Darth Reave
- Nominated by: —Tommy
(Nine two eight one) 15:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC) - Nomination comments: I am not mistaken my Lord! It was Tommy9281 I saw on the GAN!
(5 Inqs/3 Users/8 Total)
Support
- I saw him too. Grunny (Talk) 02:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- As did I. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 11:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)- Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
--Eyrezer 09:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)- –Victor (talk page) 05:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Lord Hydronium 23:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Graestan(Talk) 00:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 00:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
File:Morne Cade Azlyn.jpg, File:StryfeGhoul.jpg and File:TelekineticReave.jpg are all distorted and should be re-scanned. File:DevaronianSith.jpg is both distorted and poorly cropped (look at the bottom of the picture); re-scan and crop properly.--Imperialles 18:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Hey, Imp. I'd like to discuss this with you at your earliest convenience. Please let me know when you'll be in IRC, and I will meet you.—Tommy (Nine two eight one) 00:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)- I am unable to provide better quality scans at this time. Also, I do believe that while the images provided are not the best quality by your standards, they are of decent enough quality to succesfully illustrate the points being made in the article. I respectfully request that you strike your objections in light of these reasons. Please advise, thanks.—Tommy (Nine two eight one) 23:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Struck with the caveat that the images be replaced when better versions are available. --Imperialles 08:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am unable to provide better quality scans at this time. Also, I do believe that while the images provided are not the best quality by your standards, they are of decent enough quality to succesfully illustrate the points being made in the article. I respectfully request that you strike your objections in light of these reasons. Please advise, thanks.—Tommy
- From the Chron-O-John of Green Tentacle:
"Lord Krayt then ordered his scientist, Darth Maladi, to examine the corpse, and she immediately knew what happened to Reave. He had been transformed into a product of ancient Sith alchemy called a rakghoul, after having been infected with the creature's plague." That reads (to me at least) more like explanation for the reader's benefit than Maladi's conclusion. Since the reader already knows by this point, can you reword it a little? Even merging the sentences would help.- Addressed.
"first appeared (albeit unnamed) in the tenth installment of the Star Wars: Legacy series" That'd be 29th installment of Legacy or 10th installment of Vector, whichever way you want to look at it. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)- Addressed. Thanks for the review, GT. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy (Nine two eight one) 21:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Addressed. Thanks for the review, GT. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy
Comments
- Actually, I would like a source saying he was created by Duursema and Ostrander. Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Addressed.—Tommy (Nine two eight one) 21:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Addressed.—Tommy
Vote to strike objection (Inquisitorius only)
- Tommy left a message on Imp's talk page over a week ago, and the objection remains. Per our recent CT, I believe these images are good enough. Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I actually agree with Imp that they aren't brilliant. I offered to try and get better scans but Tommy never reminded me about it. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Eh, I know nothing about images. If others agree that they are poor, then just ignore this vote, and hopefully we can get some better scans. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I did attempt to remind AdmirableAckbar, but apparently that message was never received. If better images than the ones I provided are available, please rescan them. Thank you. If not, I feel that the current images still fall within the scope of the new guidelines, and still request to have the objection stricken based on that.—Tommy (Nine two eight one) 01:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- I gave it a go, but it doesn't look any better than what's there atm. I still don't think it's ideal, but if we can't get anything better... -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I did attempt to remind AdmirableAckbar, but apparently that message was never received. If better images than the ones I provided are available, please rescan them. Thank you. If not, I feel that the current images still fall within the scope of the new guidelines, and still request to have the objection stricken based on that.—Tommy
- Eh, I know nothing about images. If others agree that they are poor, then just ignore this vote, and hopefully we can get some better scans. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I actually agree with Imp that they aren't brilliant. I offered to try and get better scans but Tommy never reminded me about it. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Mainly because Imp isn't around to discuss the issue, and because he shouldn't be making objections when he knows he isn't going to be. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Per the CT. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Per the blinding obviousness that shouldn't have required a CT. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 23:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)