- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Cragmoloid
- Nominated by: ~Savage
02:09, April 19, 2013 (UTC) - Nomination comments: This is an old Skippy Farlstendoiro GA that is long enough to be upgraded. I gave it a facelift, so here ya go! ~Savage
02:09, April 19, 2013 (UTC)
(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 22:40, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 10:01, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:15, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Cade Calrayn 17:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
- --Eyrezer (talk) 05:34, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
JangFett (Talk) 13:37, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Floyd has one thing
In the second intro paragraph, the flow is very very choppy. Please fix.IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:22, April 24, 2013 (UTC)- Have a look. And thanks for the review! ~Savage
10:49, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Have a look. And thanks for the review! ~Savage
Eyrezer
As far as I can tell, Rooty only has one trunk. Is that right? If so, I am not sure the comment in the BTS about the elephant in Best Birthday Ever is wholly accurate/justified: "However, the character's face is partially obscured, preventing the viewer from telling how many trunks the character has, and thus whether the individual is a Cragmoloid". --Eyrezer (talk) 18:43, May 29, 2013 (UTC)- Hmm. Good point. Wonder how WOTC got it so wrong. I've fixed that information and re-added something about "Fett Club" that I had yanked in my earlier edit. Thanks for the review! ~Savage
12:29, May 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. Good point. Wonder how WOTC got it so wrong. I've fixed that information and re-added something about "Fett Club" that I had yanked in my earlier edit. Thanks for the review! ~Savage
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 13:37, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Shouldn't Best Birthday Ever be included in the Appearances section as {{[[Template:Pos|Pos]]}}? Stake black msg 02:26, April 19, 2013 (UTC)
- I've been told in other FANs that the Pos template is deprecated and that we don't really use it in appearances sources anymore. The argument is that we should only include things we're sure of there, but we can discuss the ambiguity in a BTS section with no problem. ~Savage
03:42, April 19, 2013 (UTC)
- I've been told in other FANs that the Pos template is deprecated and that we don't really use it in appearances sources anymore. The argument is that we should only include things we're sure of there, but we can discuss the ambiguity in a BTS section with no problem. ~Savage
- Just a heads up: I'll be out of the country until late August with only limited Internet access during that time. I'll do my best to address any objections that spring up with this nomination, but I apologize in advance for any delays in responding to such concerns. ~Savage
20:32, June 13, 2013 (UTC)