Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/CC-1138

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

CC-1138

(6 Inqs/2 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote Nominated. Greyman(Paratus) 00:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Imperialles 16:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. Hooray to non-TOTJ!:). Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 22:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Bah! Headshot! Thefourdotelipsis 00:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Coolest armor on a clone. - Graestan Jedi Order (This party's over) 03:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote Cull Tremayne 01:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  8. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Object

  1. Bacara's willingness to kill Mundi even though he respected him deserves a short mention in the P&T, me thinks. Other than that, the usual good work, Greyman. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 03:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. From the Heavily Pounded Desk of Four Dot
    • This might seem silly, but has Ki-Adi-Mundi ever been referred to as "Mundi" in canon? Is it really his surname? I thought his name was just one big...thing, what with the super-double hyphen tag team he's got going on.
      • Heh, I honestly don't know. But I added Ki-Adi- in front of those few Mundi's.
    • This isn't a real objection but...you're sure there's no headshot? :P
      • If there is, I haven't found any. The picture that is currently in the infobox came from his databank entry, and I haven't been able find it in a high res format yet. Although, I think the current one works fine, IMO. :P Greyman(Paratus) 13:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
    • In all seriousness though, I think the images could be used more effectively. At the moment, they're just all spaced out proportionally, which might look nice, but is misleading. Perhaps move the Vanishing point image down to the pertinent area of text, and the Sith screenshot down to the Order 66 section. That way, you're actually using them to illustrate the text. ;)
      • Placed accordingly. Thanks for the input. Greyman(Paratus) 13:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Otherwise, no problems. Interesting character. Thefourdotelipsis 09:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Approved by Inquisitorius 19:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Bah, another non-TOTJ creation...what's come over me? :P Greyman(Paratus) 00:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Think of it as a breath of fresh air :P. Then take another, and another, and... Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 03:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)