- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Am
- Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- Date Archived: 19:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Final word count: 2513 words (350 introduction, 1496 body, 667 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 2277 words (352 introduction, 1496 body, 429 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions WP:Women
(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
—spookywillowwtalk 04:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)- Lewisr (talk) 05:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Great work, I couldn't find any issues or callouts with the article. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 03:32, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Mor9347
(Talk) 01:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC) 
Love love love these Visions nominations. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 01:46, 17 March 2025 (UTC)- Booply (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well done on this, Comet! Bonzane10 19:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Object
spookly
TBF even on default view, the paragraphs for the BTS - particularly the second one - look quite large. If possible, it'd be great to rearrange the BTS into two subsections, for aesthetic.- Addressed. Wasn't sure what the best way to subsection it was, so I'm fine with swapping it if you think there's a better way. CometSmudge (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Seems to be sitting in: Category:Card game citation template usages without cardname and Category:TitanComics usages with custom archivedate.—spookywillowwtalk 17:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)- Sorted those CometSmudge (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Dani
Shouldn't Am's Theme be mentioned in the BTS (And the album listed in sources? Not sure how music works tbh) NBDani(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 21:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)- Added a mention in the BTS/sources. Didn't make a page though since I don't think its notable if I'm understanding the policy correctly CometSmudge (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
Shouldn't "non-canon" need a reference in the Bts?Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 05:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- There's a lot of precedent to not require a reference for that. I assume its similar to how we don't require a reference for saying something is Legends or canon CometSmudge (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Now you have me thinking of a new way to break everything and make everyone angry. Dangerous of you. :P Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 01:46, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Now you have me thinking of a new way to break everything and make everyone angry. Dangerous of you. :P Master Fredcerique
- There's a lot of precedent to not require a reference for that. I assume its similar to how we don't require a reference for saying something is Legends or canon CometSmudge (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Cursory note that this and the other are listed here. It was added to said scope so long ago that I'm not sure if it holds up. Could, if it is accurate (fwiw no clue since I've not watched any Visions) add it as a scope here, but also curious on your opinion as to whether it should be listed there (again, haven't watched the scene present to know, but figured to ask since it'd be good if the scope stayed consistent with the FA's project templates).—spookywillowwtalk 01:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar enough with biology to tell if its accurate that they're monozygotic as the reference says, but I think that reasoning only works if they're identical in every way except gender, which isn't the case since they have some other physical differences that wouldn't be caused by being trans (Eye color and slight hair color differences). They've both also been heavily genetically modified (Force-sensitive/Can survive in space) so changing their gender would probably be easy compared to that. Imo, probably not enough to keep them in the project scope. If it is decided to keep them though, then I'm fine with adding both articles to the project for consistency. CometSmudge (talk) 03:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Conferred with a few others and the general agreement was that that esp due to the genetic modification, is a bit speculative even for scope, so nicked that out. Thanks for the insight.—spookywillowwtalk 00:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar enough with biology to tell if its accurate that they're monozygotic as the reference says, but I think that reasoning only works if they're identical in every way except gender, which isn't the case since they have some other physical differences that wouldn't be caused by being trans (Eye color and slight hair color differences). They've both also been heavily genetically modified (Force-sensitive/Can survive in space) so changing their gender would probably be easy compared to that. Imo, probably not enough to keep them in the project scope. If it is decided to keep them though, then I'm fine with adding both articles to the project for consistency. CometSmudge (talk) 03:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving a note here since the galleries aren't required, but I believe there is some art in the Art of... book that is missing from the gallery. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 05:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- I forgot to upload the images from the last page, but all the images should be there now. Thanks for catching that CometSmudge (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 19:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)