Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/3B6-RA-7

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

3B6-RA-7

  • Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 09:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This is probably one of the best WTS's I've read so far...I mean...two GODV references. TWO.

(7 Inqs/1 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. This quite an impressive article. I agree totally with 4Dot. One of the best WTS. Darthchristian (Hey!) 17:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote "We can take over the Mos Eisley spaceport!" -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Master Aban Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 14:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote That droid is continuity gold, Jerry! Gold! -- Darth Culator (Talk) 17:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote Redundancy. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 18:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  8. Inqvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Object

  1. From the Chron-O-John of Green Tentacle:
    • I think you need to mention early in the biography that there were other RA-7s modified by ISB. It sounds like he's the only one until you mention the rumours about the model later.
    • Not an objection but we need to standardise the layout of these droid articles since our current crop of droid FAs vary a lot. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
  2. From the desk of Atarumaster88
    • "Sandcrawler" is consistently capitalized; it's a common noun, not a proper one.
    • Infobox seems to be missing a lot of links . . . vocoder, chromium at the very least, maybe antenna. ::Waves hyperinclusionist flag::
    • Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 15:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  3. Incompetence and incompetency are both used in the opening paragraph. I suggest changing one of them to something else. Soresumakashi 23:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  4. Toprawa:
    • We don't need to include his nickname in the infobox name field. We wouldn't do the same for "C-3PO - 'Threepio'. This is unnecessary and informal. Please remove.
      • We do actually inlcude nicknames in infoboxes. Since it's just a spelling out of his name however, I've given it the arse. Fixed.
        • I wasn't implying we don't include nicknames in infoboxes. What you just said is exactly why it's not needed in this instance. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
    • If he's in the Vis Dic, he's probably in the Complete Vis Dic, too. Please check and add source if so. Other than that, good. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • Has the ghost droid been FA/GA'd yet? I forget his proper name, but I love that story. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)