- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Zobyteeg
- Nominated by: OtterSurf (talk) 10:34, February 22, 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Two Tynnans for the price of... well, two. Hooray.
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
Fan26 (Talk) 16:41, February 24, 2020 (UTC)
Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 03:03, February 26, 2020 (UTC)
- Cwedin(talk) 17:21, March 1, 2020 (UTC)
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:02, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
Object
Fan
The HoloNet News article under the appearances section is missing the {{1st}} template.Fan26 (Talk) 14:42, February 23, 2020 (UTC)Per Anil's objection on the Razelfiin nom, you don't need an additional ref note to identify Tynna as a planet.Fan26 (Talk) 15:10, February 23, 2020 (UTC)
Cwedin
"when it was destroyed by stone mites." - This could probably be sourced to the HNN article instead of the encyclopedia."no-longer-existent window." - Are we sure there ever was a window in the first place? My reading of the HNN article is that Big Z didn't have a window, just a wall, which is why seeing the lake freaked him out.Cwedin(talk) 06:00, March 1, 2020 (UTC)
Anil
Unlike Razelfiin, I don't see any evidence that suggests Zobyteeg was a member of the Tynnan species."Shortly before the Clone Wars…" As far as I can see, that CSWE entry doesn't say that it happened "shortly" before the Clone Wars. You might want to use the other entry instead.You list the CSWE in the Sources, but I don't see any entry mentioning Zobyteeg. Could you please tell me which page he's mentioned on?Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:41, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
- The entry for Tynna confirms that stone mites wrecked the government building, while the HNN article does not. OtterSurf (talk) 09:52, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
- So basically he isn't. The CSWE just fills in other info. OtterSurf (talk) 11:50, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
- If that's the case, then it should be removed. The Sources list should only include sources that actually mention the article subject.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:03, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
- If that's the case, then it should be removed. The Sources list should only include sources that actually mention the article subject.
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 18:02, March 2, 2020 (UTC)