Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Vun'Hanna

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Vun'Hanna
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Zed
        • 1.1.2.2 Fan
        • 1.1.2.3 QGJ
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Vun'Hanna

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 07:43, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Zed42 (talk) 08:27, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 18:46, May 12, 2019 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 14:43, May 14, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:45, May 21, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 06:36, May 24, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • Is there anything else that can be used to refer to Lenang O'Pali other than "individual"?
    • Nah, the book lists several in-universe works and their authors like that. Imperators II(Talk) 08:09, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
      • Would "author" work, then? Zed42 (talk) 08:20, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
        • Changed. Imperators II(Talk) 08:24, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
  • I presume you've checked, but is the year 55 ABY used directly in The Essential Guide to Warfare? Zed42 (talk) 08:05, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
    • Yes, the book uses the BBY/ABY system explicitly. Imperators II(Talk) 08:09, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
      • I thought so, just checked to make sure. If only Canon dates were that easy. Zed42 (talk) 08:20, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
Fan
  • Sorry in advance for the nitpicking, but for the Outbound Flight date note, I think another sentence, or clause at least, explaining why the battle can be placed as happening by 27 BBY should be added. It's fairly obvious, but my understanding is that such things should always be added to make the status article comprehensive for the reader-apologies if that is incorrect. Fan26 (Talk) 14:51, May 11, 2019 (UTC)
    • Please take a look. Imperators II(Talk) 08:45, May 12, 2019 (UTC)
QGJ
  • Can we get some context for Mitth'raw'nuruodo in the body of the article? Right now, he is technically only mentioned within the quote and the ref note. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:22, May 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • Context for Thrawn isn't really relevant to the article's subject (same goes for Sidious), and the dating reference has been reworded to avoid mention of the former. Imperators II(Talk) 14:29, May 23, 2019 (UTC)

Comments