- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Unification Policies
- Nominated by: Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 13:33, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:I like this page!
(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
Object
- Axinal
I think a {{Law infobox}} would be appropriate here.- I added an infobox. But it was my first Law infobox. Did I do it right?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:29, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Looks good to me.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 21:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I added an infobox. But it was my first Law infobox. Did I do it right?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:29, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
I believe the Ruusan Reformation was first mentioned in The Essential Chronology, making the BTS as it's written somewhat inaccurate.- I removed the part about the Ruusan Reformation in the BTS.
That works; however, it should still be mentioned somewhere in the body, especially because it's in the infobox.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 21:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)- Got itCal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:58, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I removed the part about the Ruusan Reformation in the BTS.
The fact that Valorum was the Supreme Chancellor is currently exclusive to the intro. Could it, along with the fact that the Ruusan campaign ended in 1000 BBY, be worked into the body somewhere?- I added that Valorum was Supreme Chancellor in the body, and that the Ruusan campaign ended in 1000 BBY.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:33, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Also, Paak's opposition to the policies are currently only represented by the quote. Because his feelings towards the policies affected his actions in the novel quite prominently, I believe he probably deserves a specific mention somewhere.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 19:02, May 25, 2011 (UTC)- I added a part about the separatist group on Serenno, but I didn't add anything in about Paak personally. I figured he didn't need to be personally mentioned in this page about the policies. What do you think?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:36, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, but since the opening quote comes directly from him, I think he deserves a mention. Others may disagree, and I'm flexible here, but if you do leave it out, his name in the quote would have to be linked.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 21:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I added him into the body.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 22:02, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, but since the opening quote comes directly from him, I think he deserves a mention. Others may disagree, and I'm flexible here, but if you do leave it out, his name in the quote would have to be linked.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 21:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I added a part about the separatist group on Serenno, but I didn't add anything in about Paak personally. I figured he didn't need to be personally mentioned in this page about the policies. What do you think?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:36, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Do we have a page for the separatists here? Would the Anti-Republic Liberation Front be appropriate?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 21:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)- The Anti-Republic Liberation Front looks like it would be the right link. So I added it to the body.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 22:06, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Battle of Ruusan could use some context; that could probably be taken care of just by mentioning that it was the final battle of the New Sith Wars. I believe that would be my final objection. At this point, however, the article is 248 words, and would probably be over the limit after this is added, and thus more suitable as a good article nomination.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 22:34, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I added in about the New Sith Wars. If it needs to be moved to good article nominations, would you just erase this part off of this comprehensive articles page? And then move it to the good article page? How would you do it?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 02:08, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Looks good. This nomination would need to be archived, but as I told TK in the above nomination, I'm not sure what the rules are regarding archiving. I would leave a note under the Comments section that you intend to nominate the article for GA, and politely ask for an EC to archive this nomination. Then you can nominate the article on the WP:GAN page.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 09:36, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
- I added in about the New Sith Wars. If it needs to be moved to good article nominations, would you just erase this part off of this comprehensive articles page? And then move it to the good article page? How would you do it?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 02:08, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
- Since the article is above the 250 word limit, I'm going to nominate it on WP:GAN. If an EC could archive this I'd appreciate it. Thanks.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 12:50, May 26, 2011 (UTC)