Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified speeder (Grand Army of the Republic)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified speeder (Grand Army of the Republic)

Nominated by: Tm_T^(Talk) 00:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I know you love it, you definately do.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

Hey, why not? Menkooroo 01:30, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
-- 1358 ^(Talk) 11:20, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 13:41, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Jujiggum
- ~~What evidence do you have for this being "presumably" a 2-seat variant of the BARC speeder? This sounds like speculation to me.~~
  - Hopefully sufficiently fixed
    - Okay, but please check your grammar here. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
      - Is it ok now? --Tm_T^(Talk) 05:23, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
- ~~The BTS should specify why this is ambiguously canon.~~
  - Apparently isn't, tag removed
    - You mean this is non-canon? Then it needs to be tagged as such, and you should also mention that in the BTS. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
      - Apparently licensed toys are canon as is.
        Okay; I've stricken the objection, but it would probably still be good to make a BTS note of its canonicity, just noting that liscenced toys are canon. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:58, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
        Done. --Tm_T^(Talk) 05:23, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
        Hey, just letting you know that I removed the little bit that said it was canon because now that it says that it was liscenced, it's unneeded. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 13:41, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- ~~Also, where did you get the "BARC-2 speeder" name? If it's conjectural, then it shouldn't be bolded in full form in the intro.~~
  - Bolding removed, some explanation about the name in the Bts.
    - Please check your grammar in the BTS; also, since the name is completely conjectural, I would suggest actually moving the title of the article to something more appropriate. Maybe something along the lines of "Unidentified speeder (BARC design)" or something similar. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
      - Would "Unidentified speeder (Grand Army of the Republic) or equivalent do? --Tm_T^(Talk) 18:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
        Sounds fine to me. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:58, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- That's all. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 15:39, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  - Good points rised, thanks. --Tm_T^(Talk) 20:39, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Cleaned up a bit of grammar. "Sans" didn't really work, and even if it had, I don't think it's... enough of an English word to be used on an English encyclopedia. Menkooroo 01:30, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, appreciate it. --Tm_T^(Talk) 08:16, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
Also, I hid the table of contents with NOTOC. Menkooroo 01:35, September 2, 2010 (UTC)