Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified six-eyed aquatic creature (Naboo)

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified six-eyed aquatic creature (Naboo)

  • Nominated by: -LelalMekha 20:28, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I fear I've caught Cade's nomination-sickness.
    • S'cuse me? Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 23:30, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
      • Referring humorously to your recent "moar noms!" ;-)

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Its got a chicken leg. Weird... 501st dogma(talk) 00:04, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Cumulonimbus Cloud (Meeting Room) 02:23, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Plagueis327 (talk) 17:32, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Good work, you're sitting at 246 words, so your good to go.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:44, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. Biigg L
  1. Exiled Jedi
    • You need to mention the Mid Rim, Chomell sector and Otoh Gunga in the main part of the article, not just the introduction.
    • I only count five eyes and are you sure this is a fish? In the Phantom Menace novel the Opee sea killer is mentioned to be a crustacean and this thing looks like it could be. Perhaps you should just say aquatic creature unless the source says otherwise.
      • Only five eyes are visible, indeed. But most animals are bilaterally symmetric, so it seems reasonable to think this creature has three eyes per "half"' of its face. Now, you're right, I can't say whether it's a fish or a crustacean, so I've changed the wording to reflect that. Thanks for pointing this out. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
        • Yeah, for some reason when I looked at the picture I thought that the three bottom eyes were aligned where the middile one would be in the middle of the creature's head.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 18:41, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Please mention the leg/fin thing on the creature.
    • If its only pictured in an illustration how do you know its carnivorous?
      • Once again, it's what I'd call "biology common sense". The shape of an animal's teeth are related to its diet, and there is absolutely no point in having pointed, sharp teeth if you don't eat flesh. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
        • I'm not sure if you can state that its carnivorous, you have real-life creatures like fruit-bats that have sharp teeth and only eat fruit. Plus, in Star Wars, I don't know how much real world sciences apply. Its pretty clear that normal physics doesn't apply in Star Wars, so biology probably doesn't either.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 18:41, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
          • Thus I have removed it. --LelalMekha 18:45, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • You should mention the upper teeth as well.
    • If its pictured and not mentioned in the text please add a {{Po}} tag to the appearances list.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:12, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
    • Could you provide some context on Lake Paonga? Just mentioning it in the same sentence with the bodies of freshwater on Naboo should be enough.
    • In the history section you might want to mention that Otoh Gunga is in Lake Paonga.

Comments