Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified asteroid group

Nominated by: Imperators II (Talk) 12:34, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Yay! Space-rocks!

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Support

Object

~~I think there is a rule that you can't have text in infobox pictures. Please remedy that.~~ 501st dogma^(talk) 22:34, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Done, if you really think that's better. Imperators II^(Talk) 08:11, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
  - You don't have to cut the text box out. You could just white the text in the text box out. 501st dogma^(talk) 20:24, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
    - Like that? Imperators II^(Talk) 13:51, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
CC-8
- ~~I know this will probably make you do a decent re-write, but I don't think having that amount of writing before the article's subject is introduced is really the way to go.~~ Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 08:04, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
  - Done. Imperators II^(Talk) 18:24, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure if the title is the best it could be, I mean if there was an article about a group of droids it wouldn't be called "Unidentified droids", I'd move it to "Unidentified asteroid field" or "Unidentified asteroid cluster" take your pick. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 08:39, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  - Done, I guess. We don't know if it should be classified as a "field" or a "cluster" so I chose "group" instead. Imperators II^(Talk) 11:22, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
Winterz
- ~~The DEFAULTSORT isn't needed in this situation.~~ Winterz (talk) 12:35, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  - Removed. Imperators II^(Talk) 15:35, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

You could probably mention in the BtS that the asteroids were not formally given a location in the source. Stake black ^msg 18:34, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Added. Imperators II^(Talk) 19:52, April 4, 2013 (UTC)