Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Kel Dor Sith Lord

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Kel Dor Sith Lord

  • Nominated by: —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 06:24, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Powah!

(4 ECs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:27, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Winterz (talk) 19:39, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 21:27, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Menkooroo (talk) 06:50, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:44, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
  6. DarthRevan1173 Revan Headshot (Long live Lord Revan) 02:28, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. DarthRevan1173
    • The article could use a personality and traits section.
    • Also a powers and ability section wouldn't be a bad idea. DarthRevan1173 Revan Headshot (Long live Lord Revan) 06:28, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
      • Taken care of both.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 06:43, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
        • Just a note from me: comprehensive articles that are short enough to not require an intro (less than 200 words) don't require subsectioning. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:27, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Winterz goes to Hollywood
    • The last sentence of the P&a should go. They are already mentioned in the previous section and the appearance is irrelevant to the P&a section. Winterz (talk) 08:53, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Exiled Jedi
    • If you section the article, I believe you need a biography section. The bio should give more information about the fight between the Sith and the officers.
    • His robes look more like a dark brown to me. He also seems to wearing some kind of chest armor.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:46, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
      • Taken care of both, I took Menk's suggestion.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 14:58, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Another opinion on the subsectioning!
    • The article is short enough that subsectioning isn't needed --- since there are only 108 in-universe words, subsectioning is actually a detriment to the article rather than a benefit. So many short sections in a row are a big eyesore. Menkooroo (talk) 06:45, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments