Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Jedi Knight (Zayne Carrick)

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified Jedi Knight (Zayne Carrick)
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Manoof
        • 1.1.2.2 Ayrehead
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified Jedi Knight (Zayne Carrick)

  • Nominated by: —MJ— Comlink 06:17, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Throwaway mention + one edit = CA nomination.

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. --Eyrezer (talk) 09:31, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 10:31, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:19, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:01, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 02:10, April 26, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • Unsourced infobox.
    • Yep, I'm rusty. Fixed.
  • No eras in the infobox.
    • Doh! Fixed.
  • Context on Zayne and Dantooine.
    • Done. At that point in time, "Human" is the best that can be done for Zayne, since he's not a Jedi yet.
  • Date for when Zayne was referred to the Enclave. I'm almost certain that it's findable.
    • Researched and done.
  • Links in the quote attribution, as they aren't mentioned in the article - though it should be mentioned that the Knight told Tokare or the other Jedi, rather than just "said." Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 06:25, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
    • Linked. It's never specified exactly who the Knight said that to, so I can't expand on "said". He could have said it to Reiva, who told Vandar, or he could have said it to Vandar, who told Reiva, or he could have said it to another Jedi, who told Vandar, who in turn told Reiva. We don't know. —MJ— Comlink 21:57, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
Manoof
  • Does the release date (or just year) need to be linked in the BTS? Manoof (talk) 09:50, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • Done per Ayrehead's objection below. —MJ— Training Room 10:41, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Author and year of release should be in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:32, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • Done, and threw in the month for good measure. —MJ— Training Room 10:41, February 17, 2015 (UTC)

Comments