- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Unidentified First Order officer (Alsakan)
- Nominated by: UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:17, February 8, 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
Object
Editor
The D23 timeline provides a better source for the TLJ date for your date note.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:58, February 9, 2020 (UTC)- Just to chime in, I've received objections in the past that that timeline is not suitable for use in status articles because it was never officially released anywhere; and since the image is just sourced from Stanton's Twitter, that would conflict with this.—spookywillowwtalk 05:03, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- We had a similar issue with using that timeline for referencing the Mandalorian's timeline, which we discussed in IRC. So we currently use SW.com as the source until a better one comes out in the future. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:08, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- If you want a solid source for TLJ's date, the Rise of Skywalker Visual Dictionary places the events of TLJ in 0 ASI, or 34 ABY. Zed42 (talk) 09:52, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- I wrote a new reference using the dictionary and I'm still getting a similar word count to the old reference, so I'll just leave the date reference as it is. It's easy to write one as the novel and the films are right next to each other in regards to the timeline. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:35, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- If you want a solid source for TLJ's date, the Rise of Skywalker Visual Dictionary places the events of TLJ in 0 ASI, or 34 ABY. Zed42 (talk) 09:52, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- We had a similar issue with using that timeline for referencing the Mandalorian's timeline, which we discussed in IRC. So we currently use SW.com as the source until a better one comes out in the future. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:08, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- Just to chime in, I've received objections in the past that that timeline is not suitable for use in status articles because it was never officially released anywhere; and since the image is just sourced from Stanton's Twitter, that would conflict with this.—spookywillowwtalk 05:03, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
Fan
- "She undertook Winshur Bratt's re-employment interview to retain his job in the Corellian Engineering Corporation after the First Order took over the company, telling him he was destined for bigger things than working in Corellia" This sentence leaves me a little confused—was Bratt already a CEC employee and the interview was just a First Order loyalty check following their takeover, or something like that? Fan26 (Talk) 23:14, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- I elaborated on that more, but I've now exceeded 250 words, so the article will have to be nominated for Good status now. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:35, February 10, 2020 (UTC)