Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Evereni woman

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified Evereni woman
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Lewisr
        • 1.1.2.2 Ziara
        • 1.1.2.3 Luca
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified Evereni woman

  • Nominated by: ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional):WP:Women, Wookieepedia:WookieeProject The High Republic, WP:Novels

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 00:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 05:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
  3. ECvote There was quite a lot amiss when you first nominated this, please be careful for next time. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
  4. BloodOfIrizi Sabine Starbird (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
  5. Panther436 (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  6. ECvote LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 14:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Object

Lewisr
  • It seems relevant to include why Dobbs recalled the incident Lewisr (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Path of Deciet doesn't specifically say he remembered the incident during the novel's events. -ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola 01:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
      • Okay then, I guess I don't know how you'd include the other info then so I'll just strike it Lewisr (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Ziara
  • since we know the gender of the pantoran i think it should be added to provide a bit more context for him BloodOfIrizi Sabine Starbird (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
    • I don't really think gender is much of a context, but since we know so little about the Pantoran, I guess it makes sense. -ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola
Luca
  • Regarding the date, there is no need to introduce an extra ambiguity with "around" since it's years before anyway. Also, the date note says 382 BBY, while the article 282 BBY.
  • As a general rule, we do not hyperlink the gender together with the role/job of unidentified individuals. LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 18:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
    • All fixed. ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola 18:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • Should the THR phase the source is part of be mentioned in the BTS? - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 00:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Added. -ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola 01:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 14:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)