Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Berrun warden

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Berrun warden

• Nominated by: Cade Calrayn 16:38, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Project Hero

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. 501st dogma^(talk) 01:38, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
2. Winterz (talk) 21:32, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
3. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 00:55, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
4. Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 00:20, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Object

1. CC-8
   • Shouldn't the detention center be in the affiliations?
     • Not in my opinion.
       • I have to second Cade here, CC-8. Locations should rarely be (I believe Universities are one of such exceptions) in the affiliations section. In this case, the prison is operated by GR members so what you propose is utterly unnecessary here, same goes for the other situation. Only when there's a more specified organization operating the place, and even in those cases, the latter must receive an article and that would be the one being inserted in the affilitation, not the location. ;) Winterz (talk) 00:14, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
         • Actually, we have precedent that contradicts that, Winterz. Stake black ^msg 00:18, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
           • Eh, guess your right. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 00:55, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
   • Similar case with the Imperial outpost nom. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 06:28, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
     • I can understand that for the outpost, but this one really doesn't seem necessary to me. It's mentioned in the BTS, and I really don't see why the fact that the warden is mentioned obliquely by Rusk has to be stated in the biography.
   • Another one, since some of the squad members are named they could probably be named in this article. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 06:31, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
     • Again, I'm not really sure this one is necessary. Maybe for the detention center itself, but adding their names seems rather superfluous. Cade Calrayn 15:35, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

1. Winterz
   • Again, I request you to avoid pipelinking relevant articles like the Surgeons. You have commas and emdashes to use freely, after all.
     • Here, yes. Done.
   • Note that I've capitalized "(the) warden" for you, as it's solely referring to the individual.Winterz (talk) 00:43, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
     • Done. Cade Calrayn 04:35, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
       • Actually, undone. Warden isn't a proper title that should be capitalized, as exemplified by the multiple uses of the word in the conversation files. Cade Calrayn 16:07, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
         • Per our discussion in the IRC, I've altered my stance and recapitalized. Cade Calrayn 16:29, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
   • In the last sentence of the intro, you should use emdashes, it is..a lot of context for just two little commas.
     • Reworked the sentences to make them less run-on.
   • You use the word "warden" many times over, you should at least once, replace it with a synonym. Winterz (talk) 13:01, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
     • Done. Cade Calrayn 16:07, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

1. Exiled Jedi
   • Sorry for the post support objection, but I think you need to mention that the warden told Rusk that the squad was proud of their actions.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 16:04, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
     • Done. Cade Calrayn 16:18, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• To avoid extending the conversation in the Objections section, I'll just reply to you here, Stake. That's a whole different case because the prison had no specific organization operating it. In this situation however, you have Sith Empire and Galactic Republic. Winterz (talk) 00:23, February 28, 2013 (UTC)