- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Unidentified Aqualish defector
- Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:53, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Forget to add this nom yesterday...
(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
Good job doing this whole pile of noms. :) --Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 13:58, December 21, 2011 (UTC)- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 14:09, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
Object
"and was wounded during the battle." - What battle? Either a rewording or some context on the battle would be good.--Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 03:23, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Better? Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:41, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
Is "he was operated on" all the information there is? Nothing about post-op or anything?Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 17:26, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
- No, nothing. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:24, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
I think that you should swap the affiliations in the infobox to reflect chronological order. Should you really have a "formerly" tag for the CIS, since it all happened a long time ago it seems that it is all "formerly". What do you think?--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 16:07, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Swapped the infobox chronology. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:09, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by the second part. Could you please explain this? Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:23, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Since everything in Star Wars happened in the past, and since all in-universe articles are written in past tense, it seems that the "formerly" tag after his affiliation to the Confederacy is not really correct. I hope this explains my point better, sorry for the confusion before.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 16:27, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. I understand your point, but as we only know his fate until the point he was with the Galactic Republic, his CIS affiliation is "formerly" and has to be tagged that way. Also if we just leave both there, it would suggest that he serves both sides at the same time. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:30, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, unless someone else objects its fine with me.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 14:09, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, unless someone else objects its fine with me.--Exiled Jedi
- No problem. I understand your point, but as we only know his fate until the point he was with the Galactic Republic, his CIS affiliation is "formerly" and has to be tagged that way. Also if we just leave both there, it would suggest that he serves both sides at the same time. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:30, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Since everything in Star Wars happened in the past, and since all in-universe articles are written in past tense, it seems that the "formerly" tag after his affiliation to the Confederacy is not really correct. I hope this explains my point better, sorry for the confusion before.--Exiled Jedi
- I'm not sure what you mean by the second part. Could you please explain this? Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:23, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Swapped the infobox chronology. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:09, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments