Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Tredo Dopra

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tredo Dopra
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Amazingly
        • 1.1.2.2 Spooky
        • 1.1.2.3 Vergence
        • 1.1.2.4 Fan
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tredo Dopra

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. —spookywillowwtalk 03:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 06:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
  3. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 23:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
  4. VergenceScatter (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 01:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
  6. ECvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Object

Amazingly
  • The formatting of this article should reflect this section of the Layout Guide. AmazinglyCool CIS roundel (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
    • below 165 words. No sectioning. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
      • I am not referring to the sectioning. I am stating that it should still follow the format. For example, information about a character's skills are still to be placed after information about the character's personality. AmazinglyCool CIS roundel (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
        • Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Spooky
  • Something minor that I might be misunderstanding, but... "...seeing exotic locations that beggared the imagination." Does the source use "beggared" or something meaning similar, as it seems to refer to reducing someone to poverty. Caught my eye, wanted to check in and see what the source had referred to it as, but it seemed to not fit in this context compared to something like "astounded".—spookywillowwtalk 00:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Yes, source does somehow say beggared. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Mb then, very peculiar choice of wording on their part.—spookywillowwtalk 03:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Vergence
  • Please add context for the galactic civil war. VergenceScatter (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Fan
  • "by some time in" Just saying "during" is much less wordy here. Fan26 (Talk) 21:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Fixed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 01:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)