- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Tebru
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 18:13, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
I'd assumed there was more detail in the source, but after looking at it I agree. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:36, September 16, 2017 (UTC)- Exiled Jedi (talk) 19:31, September 17, 2017 (UTC)
- 1358 (Talk) 20:15, October 2, 2017 (UTC)
AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:20, October 9, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Ayrehead
Do you think you could make an article for her home? It seems important and detailed enough to merit one.Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:12, September 15, 2017 (UTC)- Sorry, but I'm gonna have to disagree on this one. The info you see on this article is 100% of the info there is on Tell's home, so it would be kind of redundant to create an article for it. Imperators II(Talk) 22:31, September 15, 2017 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
Actually, I just noticed something. You do not identify the planet as terrestrial outside of the infobox.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 04:34, September 24, 2017 (UTC)- I had a discussion with Toprawa about this. He believes it's common sense to assume all the planets are either terrestrial, i.e., have a physical surface, or aquatic/gaseous. In which case it would be redundant to say Tebru was a "terrestrial rocky planet". I, however, have yet to encounter a source confirming this. Instead, for example, The Essential Atlas seems to differentiate terrestrial planets from hot rock planets or ice ball planets, which is why I've opted to remove the classification from the article. Thoughts? Imperators II(Talk) 08:32, September 25, 2017 (UTC)
- I think it is safe to refer to a rocky planet as terrestrial. I'd add it back to the infobox and just leave the body as is.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 18:49, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
- Resolved via IRC.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 18:54, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
- I think it is safe to refer to a rocky planet as terrestrial. I'd add it back to the infobox and just leave the body as is.--Exiled Jedi (talk) 18:49, September 30, 2017 (UTC)
- I had a discussion with Toprawa about this. He believes it's common sense to assume all the planets are either terrestrial, i.e., have a physical surface, or aquatic/gaseous. In which case it would be redundant to say Tebru was a "terrestrial rocky planet". I, however, have yet to encounter a source confirming this. Instead, for example, The Essential Atlas seems to differentiate terrestrial planets from hot rock planets or ice ball planets, which is why I've opted to remove the classification from the article. Thoughts? Imperators II(Talk) 08:32, September 25, 2017 (UTC)