Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Tauntaun Icefall

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Tauntaun Icefall

  • Nominated by: D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 06:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 4th consecutive ice cream nom; idk imma try and get every ice cream
  • Date Archived: 22:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 187 words (0 introduction, 130 body, 57 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 124 words (0 introduction, 67 body, 57 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Galaxy's Edge

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 23:48, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 05:01, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
  3. ECvote CometSmudge (talk) 22:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • Was it actually created on Hoth? I don't' see anything in the text that specifically says that Lewisr (talk) 03:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
    • While doesn't say specifically, it does say on the side of the page "Hoth." ~ D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 04:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
      • I think some are inspired by locations/creatures (like Avedot Cake for example) and his visits there, which seems more the case here Lewisr (talk) 19:49, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
        • Fixed. ~ D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 04:37, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Its not necessary to continue to contextualize Tuggs as a chef on subsequent mentions past the first one. Meaning both the mentions in the second paragraph needn't have the extra fluff and should only refer to him by last name.
    • Fixed. ~ D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 04:30, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
  • The "5" present in the BTS should be spelled out fully as "five" as the MOS requires all numbers 1-100 to be spelled out.—spookywillowwtalk 00:32, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
    • Fixed. ~ D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 04:30, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Is this still active? Its been 11 days and no support, objections or anything yet. If there is a deadline on unaddressed objections for a week for the user, then there should be a deadline on EduCorps for reviewing. ~ D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 18:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  • Yes it's still active until either withdrawn or it failed. To be fair this page is currently 28th on the page, so just about half way on the CAN page, and I know personally I'm more inclined to be generally working my way down from the top and not from the bottom up. You'll also notice there are some noms above yours that are older (in some cases over a month) and similarly have had none/few reviews as of yet, whereas yours has only been up 13 days and in comparison that is still quite new. Sorry if you feel your noms are being ignored but that simply isn't the case. Things are slow across all three nomination pages right now, and the same few people can't be expected to review all of the nominations at the click of a finger. I strongly disagree with your idea that there should be a deadline on reviewing. As one of the most active reviewers it's simply not possible to be reviewing everything as quickly as you're trying to suggest, as much as I wish the pages were moving faster. I instead ask that you just remain patient and review nominations of others as well, one so that the above nominations will pass sooner, but also because you are more likely to get reviews on your own nominations if you're reviewing others as well Lewisr (talk) 23:40, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
    • Fair point. My bad, I wasn't looking at your and reviewers' pov. ~ D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 03:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 22:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)