Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Stridan

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Stridan

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:24, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I truly wish the canon status of other FFG stuff was clearer.

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. I'd think ST-based FFG stuff can be safely considered canon. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:05, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:57, August 16, 2017 (UTC)
  3. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 08:12, August 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:59, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 13:19, August 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Is the shuttle identified as "Upsilon-class command shuttle" anywhere in the expansion, or just as "Upsilon-class shuttle"? Imperators II(Talk) 20:33, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
    • Hmm doesn't seem to be, I hadn't noticed how inconsistent the naming for the Upsilons is. Added another source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:42, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'm fairly certain that there's precedent for ship's being used in infobox images when a picture of their pilot isn't available; however, I can't seem to find an example right now. I know I haven't completely made this up since others have mentioned it recently, so I'd appreciate if others could weigh in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:42, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
    • The articles for Redline and many other TIE pilots use ships as inforbox images. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:21, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
      • When looking for precedent, you should look among status articles, preferably more recent ones. Imperators II(Talk) 06:57, August 16, 2017 (UTC)
        • Apparently I'd completely imagined this being a thing, there doesn't appear to be any status precedent. JMAS has re-added the image to the BTS, but if people dislike it being there I'm happy to remove it all together due to the length of the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:22, August 16, 2017 (UTC)