Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Sormahil system/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Sormahil system
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fan
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Sormahil system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 14:22, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:55, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 16:03, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
  3. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:53, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:16, January 10, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 20:42, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • Forgive my foggy and most likely inaccurate memory, but I hazily recall a trend of planetnamia being used for solely species and the general "shared a name with" phrase becoming used in most other cases. Would Somahil fire gems qualify for planetnamia? Fan26 (Talk) 15:55, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
    • Actually, lately I'm not using the planetnamia template for "shared a name with", in those cases it's just sufficient to use the relevant sources for referencing. The template is, however, used for species and lots of other stuff, including beverages, events, crystals, diseases... If you go to this subpage of mine and click to sort the huge table by "Notes," you can actually see the various types of stuff I've used the template with on my CAs. So, in short, yes, the fire gems would qualify. Imperators II(Talk) 15:59, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
      • Thanks for clearing that up. Fan26 (Talk) 16:03, January 3, 2019 (UTC)

Comments