Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Sith tome (Dromund Kaas Academy)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Sith tome (Dromund Kaas Academy)

• Nominated by: —Tommy 9281 Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 17:20 UTC
• Nomination comments: This was cool. {{Spoiler}}.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

1. --Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 21:33, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
2. And with strange aeons, even death may die. ~Savage 01:21, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
3. Fully Sithified. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:41, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object

1. Cal Jedi
   • There is some seemingly important infobox exclusive material.--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 20:33, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
     • Be more specific please.—Tommy 9281 Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 21:08 UTC
       • That it was manufactured and created by the Ancient Sith. That it was specifically a Sith Scroll. And that it was created more than ten thousand years before 3956 BBY.--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 21:18, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
         • "Sith tome" denotes its manufacturer/creator. It was actually a book, which I changed in the infobox, but that is also mentioned in the article proper.—Tommy 9281 Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 21:30 UTC
           • Looks good.--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 21:33, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
2. Imperators II
   • The year 3956 BBY can't really be sourced to the novel. A note should be added that explained how the date was derived. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:31, November 24, 2011 (UTC)
     • That was the wrong year anyway. Addressed.—Tommy 9281 Saturday, November 26, 2011, 21:24 UTC
       • A note on the year 3954 BBY should be added, anyway, explaining how the date is derived. Imperators II^(Talk) 16:31, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
         • That is not necessary because the book indicates the events began with the year 3954.—Tommy 9281 Thursday, December 1, 2011, 00:02 UTC
           • Sorry for the delay. Imperators II^(Talk) 16:51, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
3. Bob
   • More of a question really, but I'd think it best practice to spell out acronyms on first mention (e.g., MMORPG). ~Savage 15:30, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
     • Addressed. Thanks for the review, Bob. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 Wednesday, December 14, 2011, 00:43 UTC
4. Toprawa:
   • Two small things. One, since the article links to book in the infobox, I think we should try to link it somewhere in the article body as well. Perhaps by pipelinking it to "tome"?
   • Secondly, the article alternates between "the academy" and "the Academy." Please choose whichever one is correct and use throughout. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:35, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
     • All set. Thanks for the review, Tope. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 Wednesday, December 14, 2011, 20:11 UTC

Comments