Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Revwien coleslaw (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Revwien coleslaw
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 OOM
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Revwien coleslaw

  • Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 17:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A former CA/GA by EJ.

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Nom nom nom. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
  3. VergenceScatter (talk) 17:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
  4. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 00:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
  5. ECvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • "XY was a type of X" — that's redundant and doesn't benefit readers at all. Precedence was to have sentences like that, but we're moving away from them, so the article body here should be reworded.
  • The BTS doesn't explain why Revwiens were an abandoned concept. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 09:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
    • How's that? JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 04:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
      • That's much better OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)