Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Reeva Demesne

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Reeva Demesne

• Nominated by: MrHappyJohn (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

Object

ImpacticForce

• The article needs a BTS section. It should mention where the subject first appeared, and the date the material was released. ImpacticForce (Talk) 17:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Curious, what's the purpose of having a first appearance in a short BTS section and/while it's already listed in Appearences?MrHappyJohn (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
• The stub template should be removed. ImpacticForce (Talk) 17:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. MrHappyJohn (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
• The article does not comply to the Layout Guide. ImpacticForce (Talk) 17:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  • I've read the guide extensively before posting. The only irregularity I'm not sure of is whether to title the second heading "History" or "Society and culture". Comment? And am I missing something else? MrHappyJohn (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
    • The "History" section should be placed right after the intro, and be called "Biography." The "appearance" section should be placed after biography, and be named "Personality and traits." That section should cover both her appearance, and her personality. As stated above, the article needs a Behind the scenes section. I also believe the article could be expanded by a lot, which would push it to a GA nom. ImpacticForce (Talk) 17:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
      • Ah, I've been referencing the sentient species and not the character reference from the Layout Guide. MrHappyJohn (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (EC only)

1. Per "nonsense nomination" clause of the Bylaws page. Article currently requires further expansion and does not comply with the Layout Guide. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
   • "Nonsense" really is an exageration, yikes! I'll work on improvements. :) MrHappyJohn (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
2. To expand on what Shay said, this article has a long ways to go before it is ready to be nominated. This subject is a major player in Catalyst, so this should be of GA length, at least. It is clear the nominator has not made an effort to read the instructions, so reviewers should not be expected to spend their time reviewing this. Tommy-Macaroni 17:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Looks like I haven't read far enough yet then, haha. I assumed she was a minor character as she was not mentioned in quite a long time and haven't been expected a return, I'll make sure to come back here. I've definitely read (not to a level of obsession though) the instructions and guidelines, am I missing something other than a Behind the scenes and correct/further organization of her information/history? MrHappyJohn (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
     • Yes, I've just checked, and Reeva is mentioned several times towards the end. It's an expectation that you complete all research prior to nomination; you shouldn't still be reading a book your character appears in during the nomination process. That is a waste of reviewers' time. As for what needs doing, the History section needs to be expanded, possibly with subsections, and there also needs to be a BTS as you mention, an expanded Personality and traits section (that is the correct heading, not Appearance), and an Equipment section. The intro also needs to be expanded, which, as ImpacticForce and I have mentioned, will tip this article over the 250 limit for CANs. Tommy-Macaroni 19:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
3. This definitely should be nominated as a GAN. Fan26 (Talk) 19:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)