Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Redhurne star

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Redhurne star

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 16:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 01:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  4. Please review my edit. Thanks. Loqiical (talk) 06:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 08:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Erebus
Imp
  • I've looked at the source, and it seems to me that you should try and go more closely here with what it actually says. It establishes the existence of two subsequent yet different subjects: the pre-(super)nova Redhurne star and its post-nova remnant. The star is not described as being white, the remnant is. And you should also incorporate all those tiny details that are still relevant to the remnant - that it was a collapsed fragment of a star, that it had an intense white glow, and that it emitted radiation that was lethal to unshielded life-forms.
    • Ah ok. I had seen it interpreted as a white dwarf star but that would've been an assumption so I thought that writing it as if it was in a new transition state would have worked. I've switched it up now.
  • I'm also seeing in the novel a mention of at least one moon in the Redhurne system. On star articles, we generally try to go in-depth on the bodies that orbited them (example), so you should note that, too. Are there any other peculiar bodies orbiting the star that are mentioned?
    • Incorporated. Since the Apailana's Promise hid behind a planet fragment turned asteroid I've made sure to make use of that info too.
      • I'm seeing in the novel that the moon was situated at the system's edge and was "shattered" and "broken". I'll leave it up to you whether to note the latter fact in this article (since the moon could have been—however unlikely—shattered prior to the supernova and therefore it could be more pertinent to note it in the Redhurne system article), but I think mentioning the former fact is relevant enough to the star. Imperators II(Talk) 13:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  • "now no sign remained on those planets' ravaged surfaces of life or civilization." — I'm interpreting this as meaning that the planets previously did host life-forms and/or sentient beings, which would be notable information for the star (for example, whether a star is able to host life in its star system is a big deal in real-life astronomy). What do you think? Imperators II(Talk) 00:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
    • My interpretation was that whatever was formally on the worlds has been wiped out, but I do get your point with the mention of life and civilisation. I'll give you the call on that. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 15:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
      • My point is, that wording to me implies that prior to going supernova the star didn't host a lifeless system (again, a big deal in real life, for example), which I'd like to see reflected in the article. Imperators II(Talk) 13:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 08:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)