Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Rakhuuun

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Rakhuuun
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Ayrehead
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Rakhuuun

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 06:26, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: That's the weirdest spelling of "raccoon" I've seen in a while.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. I think using the Shipyard cat is perfectly valid in this situation. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:13, August 22, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Works for me. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:53, August 28, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 11:08, September 5, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 14:54, September 7, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 17:20, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • I'm not sure the planet itself should be in the shipyards category unless the source describes the entire planet as being one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:28, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
    • While I agree with you that the category isn't applicable from a classification viewpoint, I was thinking it would be beneficial for site navigation purposes. A reader would much more likely discover that Rakhuuun had a shipyard (if it wasn't covered in the shipyard article itself) if it was simply in Category:Shipyards than if he/she had to use the WhatLinksHere feature. I can remove it, though, if you disagree. Imperators II(Talk) 07:43, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
      • To be honest I'd rather an article was made for the shipyard and that included in the category instead. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:06, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
        • Since I'm reluctant to create a conjecturally-named article which would only contain information that's 100% covered in this article, I've opted to instead add Rakhuuun to Category:Planets with shipyards. How does that look to you? Imperators II(Talk) 19:32, August 28, 2017 (UTC)

Comments