Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Pippip 3

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Pippip 3
    • 1.1 (4 ECs/3 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fan
        • 1.1.2.2 Zed
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.4 Anil
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Pippip 3

  • Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:43, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Here we go again

(4 ECs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. May need an update come September, but we'll see --Lewisr (talk) 02:18, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 (talk) 02:26, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Fan26 (Talk) 13:36, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:12, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:04, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 01:51, June 26, 2019 (UTC)
  7. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 08:35, June 26, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • The whole first paragraph is a run-on sentence that should be broken up. Fan26 (Talk) 12:59, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:35, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
Zed
  • I don't think mentioning "in the new Star Wars canon" in the BTS is necessary since it never existed in Legends.
    • Removed the word "new"
  • Does Star Wars: Women of the Galaxy not provide any new information? It's listed in the Sources but nothing's referenced to it.
    • Nothing, its just a simple mention that it was Tallie's homeworld
  • Minor thing, but the Databank link for the Resistance pilot image gallery states the relevant info is in image 6 of 6, but the gallery seems to contain more than 6 images. Zed42 (talk) 19:58, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • Updated--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:35, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • The Sources list should just list the home page for the Resistance Pilots Databank entry. Link to those individual slides only if you're referencing something. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:51, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Changed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:53, June 24, 2019 (UTC)
  • Who was this "known to"? If you can't directly attribute this to something, it's best to avoid known/unknown phrasing such as this. Otherwise it's better to just say "It was populated by...": "Pippip 3 was known to be populated by creatures such as dire hounds and whellays."
    • Changed to "It was populated by"
  • Just checking, does the source actually spell cropduster this way? "...as a cropduster."
    • That's correct, the book spells it as cropduster. Fragment of the book: "an old RZ-1 A-wing that her father used as a cropduster on their farm"
  • I'm a bit confused by this wording that says "the First Order TIE fighter formation." What is the TIE fighter formation? Do you mean to say "a TIE fighter formation"?
    • Corrected
  • Since this is a Canon article with no Legends counterpart, it's not necessary to state that first appearance is a "canon reference book." That's a given. Just remove "canon" from there. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:18, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
    • Removed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:33, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • As there were more than one TIE fighter model used during the evacuation of D'Qar, I think I would prefer to have "TIE fighter" pipeinked to TIE fighter series instead of TIE/fo space superiority fighter. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:48, June 24, 2019 (UTC)
    • Changed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:58, June 24, 2019 (UTC)

Comments