- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Pippip 3
- Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:43, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Here we go again
(4 ECs/3 Users/7 Total)
Support
- May need an update come September, but we'll see --Lewisr (talk) 02:18, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
- Zed42 (talk) 02:26, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
- Fan26 (Talk) 13:36, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:12, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:04, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
MasterFred(Whatever) 01:51, June 26, 2019 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 08:35, June 26, 2019 (UTC)
Object
Fan
The whole first paragraph is a run-on sentence that should be broken up. Fan26 (Talk) 12:59, June 22, 2019 (UTC)- Done--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:35, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
Zed
I don't think mentioning "in the new Star Wars canon" in the BTS is necessary since it never existed in Legends.- Removed the word "new"
Does Star Wars: Women of the Galaxy not provide any new information? It's listed in the Sources but nothing's referenced to it.- Nothing, its just a simple mention that it was Tallie's homeworld
Minor thing, but the Databank link for the Resistance pilot image gallery states the relevant info is in image 6 of 6, but the gallery seems to contain more than 6 images. Zed42 (talk) 19:58, June 22, 2019 (UTC)- Updated--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:35, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa
The Sources list should just list the home page for the Resistance Pilots Databank entry. Link to those individual slides only if you're referencing something.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:51, June 23, 2019 (UTC)- Changed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:53, June 24, 2019 (UTC)
Who was this "known to"? If you can't directly attribute this to something, it's best to avoid known/unknown phrasing such as this. Otherwise it's better to just say "It was populated by...": "Pippip 3 was known to be populated by creatures such as dire hounds and whellays."- Changed to "It was populated by"
Just checking, does the source actually spell cropduster this way? "...as a cropduster."- That's correct, the book spells it as cropduster. Fragment of the book: "an old RZ-1 A-wing that her father used as a cropduster on their farm"
I'm a bit confused by this wording that says "the First Order TIE fighter formation." What is the TIE fighter formation? Do you mean to say "a TIE fighter formation"?- Corrected
Since this is a Canon article with no Legends counterpart, it's not necessary to state that first appearance is a "canon reference book." That's a given. Just remove "canon" from there.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:18, June 25, 2019 (UTC)- Removed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:33, June 25, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
As there were more than one TIE fighter model used during the evacuation of D'Qar, I think I would prefer to have "TIE fighter" pipeinked to TIE fighter series instead of TIE/fo space superiority fighter.Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:48, June 24, 2019 (UTC)
- Changed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:58, June 24, 2019 (UTC)