Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Phidna

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Phidna

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Last of my Geonosian beasties noms
• Date Archived: 14:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• Final word count: 187 words (0 introduction, 115 body, 72 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
2. Lewisr (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
3. —spookywilloww^talk 14:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Object

Anil

• Do you think it'd be speculative to pipelink "glowing" to Bioluminescence and add Category:Bioluminescent creatures? Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Eh, I'm not confident enough that there's no other reason a creature would glow to make that link. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Fair enough. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Fan

• Is the Legends image of the Phidna really necessary? There's hardly any room for it and only the info regarding its development in Legends is needed, not an actual picture of it in Commando. Fan26 (Talk) 17:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Eh, it fits within the BTS for me and I think it's always worth including an image if possible, but I can remove it if you feel strongly about it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Nah, if you're fine with it it's not something I feel pressed over Fan26 (Talk) 19:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 14:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)