Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Naboo crystal

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Naboo crystal

  • Nominated by: ThePedantry (talk) 08:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 19:19, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 222 words (0 introduction, 82 body, 140 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 153 words (0 introduction, 65 body, 88 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 04:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 00:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. RocketLaunchJr1 Ever been to Ghorman? 02:15, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • There's a couple BTS issues, firstly that the first Legends full appearance needs to also be mentioned (in addition to 1stm; as most/many "1st" type milestones get mentioned).
    • Ah, this was the first time submitted one where the legends version had two separate 1stm/1st. ThePedantry (talk) 03:10, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  • In addition, full dates are always included for magazines when known.
  • Magazines are also always linked by series and by issue, so it would likely end up some variant of "in the eighty-seventh issue of the Star Wars Insider magazine." to replace the plainlink.
  • When referring to the canon continuity, it is usually introduced as "the current Star Wars canon" or similar so as to be as precise as possible for readers.
  • To fix grammatically: "can be used a a trinket yo customize the appearance"
  • Seems like there's a touch of double-linking occurring in the body portion of the article.
  • Naboo as linked in the infobox appears to be infobox-exclusive; though the planet is referred to in the body, the cultural group isn't which needs to be worked in somehow.
    • Updated, let me know if you thing that body reads well.ThePedantry (talk) 03:10, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Is Crystal not more accurately placed in the type field of the infobox? That would generally align more with most of the gemstone nominations that have passed previously—spookywillowwtalk 23:44, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
  • The full dates for the magazine and the book need separate refs, as neither Insider nor novels self-support anything sans year usually.
    • Forgot about that, will be fixed now.
  • Please include mention of Star Wars: Legacy of the Force as the series for the novel.—spookywillowwtalk 18:06, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • It seems the standard for crystal status articles is to use the substance template (some like these ones, so do think that should be swapped over to replace the artifact template Lewisr (talk) 03:44, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    • The main reason I went with artifact was because the substance didn't have fields for culture and affiliation, which I thought were meaningful to include for this article. But I went ahead and made the switch. ThePedantry (talk) 04:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Yeah fair, thought it was somewhat related to that Lewisr (talk) 04:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 19:19, 5 October 2025 (UTC)