- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Mechanized assault flyer
- Nominated by:
03:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Erebus Chronus (talk)
- Nomination comments: I always liked this ship in BF I
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
When an LAAT marries one of Hondo's saucers. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 14:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)- Looks good!--Liverpool92
(talk) 21:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC) - JediMasterMacaroni
(Talk) 22:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC) - Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Object
OOM
"a vehicle that predated the HMP droid gunship used by the Confederacy of Independent Systems" Was the flyer used by the CIS against the Republic? Or is the article referring to the HMP gunship here? The article should clarify this.OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)- Fixed. Thanks for the review!
12:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Erebus Chronus (talk)
- Fixed. Thanks for the review!
CC-8
Should include a timeframe for the Clone Wars.- Not necessary as I would require a separate note for it.
- I think it's warranted in this case because if the flyer was replaced by the HMP then that gives a slight timeframe on when the flyer was used. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- This is a bit up in the air right now. On a previous nomination of mine, an EC objected against that not seeing relevance to it, so I'm not sure at the moment.
04:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Erebus Chronus (talk)
- Actually, a narrower timeframe should be given where possible. It's possible here since the MAF predated the HMP, which was introduced during the events on Onderon. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- How does that look?
23:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Erebus Chronus (talk)
- That's great. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- How does that look?
- Actually, a narrower timeframe should be given where possible. It's possible here since the MAF predated the HMP, which was introduced during the events on Onderon. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- This is a bit up in the air right now. On a previous nomination of mine, an EC objected against that not seeing relevance to it, so I'm not sure at the moment.
- I think it's warranted in this case because if the flyer was replaced by the HMP then that gives a slight timeframe on when the flyer was used. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not necessary as I would require a separate note for it.
Based on the word "flyer", the article should be in Category:Air vehicles and it should be mentioned that it's an aerial vehicle in the body.Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)- Fixed.
16:54, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Erebus Chronus (talk)
- Fixed.
UberSoldat
Based on the limited information available, do you think an infobox can be added?UberSoldat93(talk) 06:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think there's not enough info to maintain one right now.
15:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Erebus Chronus (talk)
- I don't think there's not enough info to maintain one right now.
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 17:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)